Choosing a Platform

Choosing a Platform: Open Source Versus Commercial

Git 1,932 hosting platforms compared, September 2026 (per user per month)
Platform License Cheapest paid plan Included CI minutes Self-hosted option
GitHub 29 Proprietary Team, $4 2,000 free, 3,000 Team Enterprise Server (paid)
GitLab 377 Open core (MIT core) Premium, $29 400 free, 10,000 Premium Free CE or paid EE, 8-16 GB RAM
Bitbucket 2,046 Proprietary Standard, $3.65 50 free, 2,500 Standard Data Center, license until 2029
Gitea 3,896 MIT Enterprise, $9.50-$19 Your own runners Free, ~100 MiB RAM
Forgejo 16,221 GPLv3+ None (donations) Your own runners Free, ~100 MiB RAM

Open-source projects belong on GitHub, where contributors and free public-repository minutes are, or on Codeberg 3,719 for a nonprofit, copyleft home. Companies wanting one integrated tool, often self-managed, pay for GitLab Premium; Jira 619 shops pick Bitbucket; small teams and air-gapped networks run Forgejo or Gitea on a small VM with their own runners. Gitea, Forgejo and GitLab import a GitHub repository with its issues and pull requests, but workflows and rulesets must be rewritten, so keep the YAML thin: BookNest's ci.yml only calls npm 2,036 ci and npm test, which run unchanged on any of these hosts.