Retrofit vs Ktor

Retrofit Versus Ktor Client: A Comparison

Both clients are free, Apache 2.0 and actively maintained. They differ in shape and reach:

Retrofit 43,944 and the Ktor 274,728 client (GitHub 29 stars, Sep 2026: 43.9k, 47.1k and 14.5k)
Retrofit 3.0.0 + OkHttp 5.5.0 47,077 Ktor client 3.6.0
Style Annotated interface, generated at run time Function calls in a DSL
Platforms JVM and Android Android, JVM, iOS, JS, Wasm, native
Engine OkHttp Pluggable: OkHttp, CIO, Darwin, JS
Extras Interceptors, OkHttp's cache Plugins: auth, retry, logging, WebSockets

Choose Retrofit for an Android-only app: the interface documents the API, every Android code base knows it, and OkHttp is proven at huge scale. Choose Ktor when networking code must be shared with iOS or the web through Kotlin Multiplatform 25,990 (Kotlin Multiplatform), or when your server already runs Ktor.